Monday, October 30, 2006

An Open Letter to Tomball ISD Board of Trustees

An Open Letter to Tomball ISD Board of Trustees

First, I would like to thank each of your for your time and effort you have committed to Tomball ISD and to our childrens education.

The future of Tomball ISD is important to me, as I have three children either already attending or about to attend various schools in Tomball. Therefore, I did what every parent should do if they want a say in the future of their children, I got involved. I have spent the last few months as a member of the subcommittee on Student Growth as a part of the overall facilities study currently in process. It has been, at times, a frustrating experience, but very educational.

As the subcommittee on Student Growth puts the finishing touches on our proposal to be submitted to the Steering Committee, I wanted to let you know some of my concerns. I applaud Tomball ISD for engaging the members of the community to be a part of this process. It allows the community to have an influence on our children’s future and ensures that our children will have adequate facilities to help them be successful academically and in extracurricular areas as well. However, I understand our input is a recommendation and nothing more. Our proposal will be presented to the Steering Committee and eventually to you, the Board of Trustees. Based on the results of the last Facilities Study, it is likely that the final proposal, which will eventually be voted on in a bond election, will look nothing like our original proposal.

Typically, the response to this problem would be to vote down the bond proposal and hope to have it rewritten to better meet the needs of the district. However, due to the failure of the District Administration to begin the Facilities Study process in the recommended 5 year time frame, we will have a huge over crowding problem in our district if the bond does not pass. It is imperative that we get this right the first time. In my opinion, a bond proposal that does not include a New High school at the Shaw road location will fail. This will delay the bond at least 6 months until the November election. This will jeopardize our ability to provide much needed elementary schools by the 2009-10 school year. Enrollment at Lakewood Elementary would be 375 students over the operational capacity, Willow Creek would be over by 341, Rosehill over by 86 students, and Decker Prairie over by 50 students.

As you can see, our elementary schools will have expanded well beyond their capacity over the next two years. If a passable bond proposal is not on the ballot in May of 2007, the education of our children will suffer. During the Facility Study process, it became apparent that there was an overwhelming majority in the District in support of a new high school in Tomball. It is that same majority that will ensure a successful bond election in May.

Once again, I appreciate everything you have done and will continue to do in the future. I am sure you and your colleagues will develop a Bond proposal that addresses all the issues facing Tomball ISD today and in the near future.


Thanks again,

Thomas C. Young

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Vote for the Tomball Mascot

You can follow this link and vote for the Tomball Mascot. If he wins, Tomball High School gets $5,000.

You can vote everyday through October 27th.

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

October 10th Meeting Overview

The Sub-Committee is back to the original size, around 25 people. We spent the first 1.5 hours going over information we had already covered and wasted a lot of time. Then we broke out into 3 sub-sub-committees, one for the new high school, one for the Junior highs and one for Elementary and Intermediate schools. Each group was to determine the best solution for each level in the follow areas:

1. Determine how many new schools would be needed.

2. The time frame of when each school would be needed.

3. The location of each school.

Each group will then present their proposals to the group as a whole for further discussion. This process began in the last 20 minutes of the meeting and it was the only real value that came out of the meeting.

I served on the group looking at Elementaries and Intermediate schools. We generally agreed that we would need to build the following schools:

1. K-4 Elementary in Northpointe - Construction to begin immediately
2. K-6 in The Woodlands area that would be converted to a K-4 - Construction to begin immediately
3. Intermediate School in The Woodlands - Construction to begin after the K-6 is complete.
4. Another K-4 Elementary in the north part of the district. Construction would begin sometime around 2009/2010.

We have land for the first three schools, but do not have land or a specific location for the last elementary.

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Meeting Tonight

The Agenda states that the meeting tonight starts at 7:00pm, it actually starts at 7:30pm at Tomball Int. School Auditorium.

7:30PM TONIGHT

Vote on New High School

As most of you probably already know, the sub-committee voted on the 9th Grade Campus vs. a New High School campus at the last meeting. The vote was 123-24 in favor of a new High School. We still have a lot of work to do on the sub-committee and I hope the large attendance does not disappear now that the vote has been taken.

There still may be a push by certain sub-committee members to include an option for a 9th grade campus in our proposal. The way the issue was worded prior to the vote did not indicate that it would be possible but stranger things have happened.

There is clear support by a "vast" majority of sub-committee members, and I believe in the community as well for a new High School. We CANNOT give the Steerring Committee and Board an option. It is true, they still can change our proposal before it gets to a bond election, but we cannot give them the opportunity to say that a 9th grade campus was a solution we supported.

Agenda for October 10th Meeting

AGENDA
October 10, 2006
Student Growth/Instructional Facilities Sub-Committee
Facility Study Committee
Date: October 10, 2006
Time: 7:00 PM
Place: Tomball Intermediate School Auditorium
723 West Main, Tomball, TX 77375
The auditorium is a separate building located near the southwest corner
of the school on Vernon Street south of Main.
1. Discussion of timeline for remaining meetings
2. Discussion of final report development process
3. Create subcommittees to develop facility need/construction flow charts. This will
include timelines, general locations and estimated costs in 2006 dollars.
4. Presentations from each of the above committees
5. Discussion and support of final facility need/construction flow charts.
All members should review, print and bring to the October 10 meeting a copy of
Sections 1 – 5 of the 1999-2006 Student Growth Committee Report. It can be found on
the website listed below. Please note that this report includes six sections. The final
section, Administrative Facilities, will not be needed for our committee.
http://www.paradigmconsultants.com/content.asp?secnum=182&pid=196

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Article to appear in the Potpourri this week


Tisd steering committee

By Brandon Moeller
Potpourri Staff Writer

The over-whelming majority of residents who attended a Tomball school district future growth planning subcommittee meeting last week seemed to be in favor of the district building a new high school opposed to creating a campus geared to ninth graders only. The issue was to be voted on by members of the subcommittee Oct. 3, at 7 p.m. at the auditorium located adjacent to the campus of the Tomball Intermediate School, 723 W. Main in Tomball.

Last week’s meeting was held at the Tomball Independent School District bus barn, which nearly brimmed at its capacity as many newcomers – spurred to attend by mass e-mails and flyers – listened to presentations from two points of view.

The leader of the subcommittee, Brent Lapsley – who also serves as the president of the Tomball Economic Development Corp. and who is the vice president of Houston engineering consulting company Paradigm Consultants – started off the meeting by dismissing rumors and giving an overview of a steering committee process that began two months ago.

“To become a member of the subcommittee, you’ll need to fill out a member form,” Lapsley said, to dispute a rumor that newcomers were not allowed to join. “The subcommittee will vote – but the word ‘vote’ is only to determine if we have a (vast) consensus, and that’s it.”

Lapsley said those who attended the Oct. 3 voting meeting could have become members that day by merely filling out a form that would include them on the subcommitte’s roster.

In previous meetings, the group has decided that construction of a new “flex” K-6 school needs to begin in The Woodlands as well as an elementary school in the Northpointe area to meet projected enrollment numbers. In The Woodlands, the eighth and newest village – Creekside Park Village – is set to open in mid-2007, and by the year 2014 is expected to add more than 5,400 school-aged children to Tomball ISD classrooms.

The group has also previously agreed that construction needs to begin in 2009 on an intermediate school for The Woodlands area as well as an additional elementary school in the district, as well as construction beginning on a new junior high school somewhere in the district in 2010.

Last week’s meeting was to present information to help the subcommittee decide if the district should build a new high school or use the existing Tomball Junior High School as a ninth grade campus and then build a new Junior High School beginning in 2007.

Each side was allotted a 20-minute presentation, but during this week’s meeting, additional presentations from both sides were to be made, prior to the subcommittee vote to determine if a vast consensus could be reached.

At the first meeting of the subcommittee two months ago, Lapsley said he’d like to see the “vast majority” of the subcommittee make a recommendation to the TISD school board-appointed steering committee about what recommendation it in turn should make to the school board.

The school board is then expected to make the final decision March 6 about what – if any – type of school bond issue should be put to voters in May.

Ninth grade campus
Last week, three subcommittee members made a presentation to present the idea of the district utilizing a ninth grade campus to handle the expected large increases of enrollment spurring from additional development in the Northpointe and The Woodlands areas. The idea this side favors is converting the existing Tomball Junior High School – located across the street from the current Tomball High School – into a ninth grade campus and having the district build a new junior high school.

Parent Debbie Pallini and teachers Terrie Ford and Julie Bentley, all members of the TISD-board appointed steering committee, made the presentation. Pallini and Ford spoke during a majority of the 20-minute presentation, and Bentley was unable to complete her portion of the presentation concerning how the district could fund the idea.

Ford spoke first about the “unique” problems of ninth grade students, and she said those problems could be addressed by separating ninth graders from the larger high school population.

“Ninth grade is a pivotal year that determines which students will prevail and which will fail,” Ford said. “Studies conducted in Texas in 2000 and 2001 show that 70 to 80 percent of students who fail to pass ninth grade will not graduate from high school. Kingwood High School states that their ninth grade went from a 9 percent failure rate to a 3 percent failure (rate) as a result of opening ninth grade-only campuses.”

Kingwood’s Ninth Grade Center – now in its 13th year – will eventually become a 4A high school with all four grade levels in the fall of 2009, as the Humble school district plans to add a grade level to it every year beginning next year.

Pallini spoke next, and she outlined the number of students expected to be enrolled in ninth through 12th grades in the district during the 2010-11 school year, with the projected number of The Woodlands students included.

Using TISD-provided projected numbers, Pallini said students expected in 2010 are 1,096 ninth grade students, 928 10th grade students, 872 11th grade students and 869 12th grade students, for a total of 3,765. She said if the district were to use Tomball Junior High School as a ninth grade campus and retain the existing Tomball High School to serve 10th through 12th grade students, then the total “operational capacity” – defined as the maximum number of students the schools can hold – for both schools is 4,769. With an expected enrollment of 3,765 in 2011, Pallini said the two high-school-age campuses will be at a 78.9 percent operational capacity.

But, Pallini said the ninth grade campus itself would be at a 98.6 percent operational capacity, or 15 students shy of the operational limit.

“This assumes that all ninth grade students would be at the TJHS building (all the time), but many ninth grade students will be taking one or two classes at the THS building,” Pallini said. “At any time, the THS building may be more crowded than the 73.5 percent and the TJHS building may be less crowded than the 98.6 percent.”

Pallini said that classes could be balanced between the two schools for ninth graders, to delay the necessity of another high school or another set of a ninth grade campus coupled with high school until past the 2014-15 school year, when a 94.8 percent operational capacity is expected for a ninth grade and high school combination.

“I’ve been a resident of the ( Lakewood area) for 18 and a half years,” Pallini said. “When I joined this subcommittee, I was so excited about a high school on the south side of Tomball. I hate the drive to Tomball everyday (to drop off and pick up my children). But after reviewing the numbers, I think Tomball will need a new high school – but not right now.”

Pallini also said retaining one high school coupled with a ninth grade campus could provide more advanced placement and dual credit opportunities for students.

Bentley – who was given about two minutes to speak and who did not complete her presentation – briefly noted that according to information provided by the school district, using the existing Tomball Junior High School as a ninth grade campus and building a new junior high is significantly less expensive than building a new high school.

Under that plan, building a new junior high school and other schools needed to keep up with the projected student enrollment is expected to cost near $153 million.

New high school
J.P. Magill gave the presentation examining the new high school option. He said many school districts that had previously tried a ninth grade campus system had found it to be unpopular when compared to building smaller high schools.

“In a larger school, they focus on the top 10 percent, the worst 10 percent and the other 80 percent – where most of our students are – fall by the wayside,” Magill said. “Less than 30 high schools in Texas have more than 3,000 students, and Cy-Fair, one of our neighbors, is one of them.”

By using Tomball Junior High School as a ninth grade campus – with 1,111 students projected by 2012 – the 10th through 12th grade Tomball High School would have 3,628 students.

“With that many students, will we have gotten beyond what THS can teach students properly?” Magill asked.

Magill said the advantages of two smaller high schools include more opportunities for students in term of athletics and other extra-curricular activities, higher test results, a higher percentage of students progressing to college, higher student confidence levels and “students feeling part of the school community.”

Magill said that the projected enrollment suggests that both high schools would have a UIL 5A rating, as that ranking begins with 1,985 students. He also said that advanced placement courses “should not suffer.”

“Superintendent (John) Neubauer assured the community that programs will be maintained at both campuses,” Magill said, referring to comments allegedly made by Neubauer at a April 2006 meeting with parents at Lakewood Elementary School .

Building a new high school along with the other schools necessary to keep up with the projected growth would cost about $182.8 million, Magill said.

“That’s a hell of a lot of money,” Magill said. “But we have to build it now in order to be prepared.”

Magill said the ninth grade campus proponents would eventually have to consider renovating the current Tomball Junior High School in 2015, or they would have to build a new high school or a second ninth grade campus then. He said a new high school, based on projected 2012 costs, would cost the district an excess of $91.5 million in 2015, and building a new ninth grade campus would cost in excess of $60 million.

Magill said the decision to build a new high school along with the other needed schools, instead, would only cost $182.8 million, compared to $244.6 million (with a 2015 high school) or $213.1 million (with an additional 2015 ninth grade campus).

“It’s either we pay for it now, or we pay a lot more later,” Magill said.

E-mail Brandon Moeller at bmoeller@hcnonline.com.

August 14th Article from the Tomball Magnolia Tribune

New TISD committees to study facilities
By Brian WalzelTribune Staff

The Tomball Independent School District is looking to the community to help determine what, if any, new schools or facility upgrades the district may need in the next five years.
At an Aug. 7 open meeting, district officials outlined the functions of three subcommittees, which comprise the Tomball ISD Steering Committee, chaired by former Tomball High School graduate Stephen Hohl. The three subcommittees will examine the educational adequacy of the district’s existing facilities, student growth and possible financing of new facilities for student and program growth.
According to the district, the Board of Trustees recently commissioned a study to be conducted by members of the Tomball ISD community to assess the needs for facility improvements and expansion for the years 2006-07 through 2010-11.
The three subcommittees, made up primarily of members of the district community, will meet throughout the fall semester before presenting their findings to the Steering Committee, which will then make a recommendation to the Tomball ISD Board of Trustees.
Hohl said he expects the committees to assemble a good plan. “If we keep in mind what’s best for the district, I think we’ll get a good plan,” he said. The three subcommittees will examine three different aspects of the district and its growth. “These subcommittees will study such topics as demographics of the area, population projections, programs of other school districts, the district’s current financial position and methods of financing capital expenditures,” the district stated.
In 2004, officials with The Woodlands Operating Company announced plans to develop another village, Creekside Village, a development that will lie within the boundaries of the Tomball ISD. The village is set to open in early 2007 and a new elementary school is already on the horizon, district officials have said.
The subcommittees may also consider the possibility of building a new ninth grade campus and making improvements to the district’s current facilities. One of the requirements the school board has put on any new facilities the committees consider, is that kindergarten through sixth grade campuses should be built close to neighborhoods.
The Steering Committee will be comprised of a representative cross-section of the district, including students, staff, parents, business and community members and administrators. Meeting community expectations, Hohl said, is a key component to the success of the project. “What we do needs to reflect what this community expects out of this school board,” he said.
School Board President Kathy Hanson said that board members likely wouldn’t be around much during the meetings, but not for a lack of interest. “After tonight, you won’t be seeing a whole lot us, but not because we’re not interested,” she said. Hanson said she wants the committees to work on their own, without the board “looking over their shoulder.” “We’d love to be at every meeting,” she said.
All committee meetings will be open to the public and committees are still open to those wishing to join. For more information, call the Tomball Independent School District at 281-357-3100.

Monday, October 02, 2006

Tomball Facilities Study Process

Tomball Facilities Study Process.

Below you will find a basic flowchart of what will happen over the next few months. I have also included to the right, what we can do at each step to make our case for a new high school.


Attend the subcommittee meetings and actively participate. Educate yourself on all sides of the issue and decide what you believe would be best for the school district.


Attend the Public forum and voice your opinion for or against the Steering Committees recomendations.





Make your feelings known to the members of the school board before March 6th.

If you are in agreement with the bond vote for, if not, decide if we can afford to defeat the bond, knowing that overcrowding will be a huge problem at the elementary schools.

Keep in mind, when this bond goes to election, we cannot say "Yes, build the elementary schools but not the 9th grade campus". There will be two boxes, yes or no.

Bottom line is we need to engage the supporters of the 9th grade campus and the "undecided" voters. We need to educate them on our proposal and convince them that if the New High School goes to bond, it is an affordable and viable solution for Tomball ISD. If we do not, the bond election could fail.

Moving Forward...

What is best for Tomball ISD... that is the real question we need to answer, isn't it. I think there are people on both sides of the issue that have lost sight of that common goal.

Each resident of Tomball ISD who has an interest in our future, needs to do what I did. Make time to sit down and spend an hour or two going through the key data and facts. Throw out the conjecture and emotional pleas, just take a look at each proposal, the data behind them and make a decision that YOU are comfortable with.

So much attention has been focused on the argument about the 9th Grade Campus or New High School, that we never talk much about the real problem in this school district and that is the over crowding of the elementary schools and in the very near future the intermediate schools.

In the next two years we will have 4 out of 5 Elementary schools above their operational capacity. Lakewood Elementary, where my kids go to school, will have 264 kids more then they have classrooms for. If we pass a bond election in May of 2007, the first school will not open until the 2009-10 school year.

That is why the decision about a new 9th Grade Campus or New High School is so important. If we cannot decide as a district what is best, then the bond will fail. If the bond fails, the education of our elementary students will suffer due to over crowding.

By drawing a line along 2920 and saying you are either with us or against us, as many supporters of both sides have done, you are just setting both sides up for failure. By polarizing the issue and alienating the other side it makes it more difficult for each side to find a common ground.

I support a new high school in the south part of the district. I have been through the data provided by Tomball ISD and I believe the Tomball High School has reached its capacity. That is my opinion, it is not a fact and it is not the only opinion. There are people the believe the 9th grade campus would be best for TISD. My opinion is no more “right” then theirs.

I hope this committees proposal includes a new high school. If it does, I hope all the bridges that have been burned over the last few weeks can be repaired before the bond election. Because if they are not repaired, the bond will fail.

Presentations from last week

Here are the links to the two presentations that were made at the meeting last week.

Pro High School Presentation....

Pro 9th Grade Presentation...

Agenda for October 3rd Meeting

AGENDA
Student Growth/Instructional Facilities Sub-Committee
Facility Study Committee

Date: October 3, 2006
Time: 7:00 PM
Place: Tomball Intermediate School Auditorium
723 West Main, Tomball, TX 77375
The auditorium is a separate building located near the southwest corner
of the school on Vernon Street south of Main.

1. Additional factual presentations by Pro Second High School and Pro Ninth
Grade Campus supporters. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS WILL BE
ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION OF FACTUAL INFORMATION ONLY WITH
REFERENCE INDICATION FOR ALL INFORMATION PRESENTED.

2. Vote for support of Second High School or Ninth Grade Campus options.

3. Discussion concerning K-6 facilities in The Woodlands area

4. Preliminary development of facility need/construction flow charts

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

How Do I Get Involved?

GET INVOLVED WITH THE FUTURE OF TISD

When: Tuesday October 3rd, 2006
7:00 p.m. sharp (arrive at 6:45 p.m.)
Tomball Intermediate Auditorium (located on FM 2920)
Every Sub-Committee Member will be able to cast their vote

How do I become a Sub-Committee Member and what are my duties?

  • Attend a meeting
  • Sign Roster
  • Fill out sub-committee form (form can be filled out at meeting)

Stay informed by attending meetings whenever possible and/or reviewing minutes on the website


Tuesday October 3rd, a vote will be taken by all sub-committee members for either a 9th grade campus or a second high school along with other campus decisions. The results of this vote will be used to make recommendations to the Steering Committee.

This is a vote to determine what recommendations will be made to the Steering Committee. This recommendation will then be reviewed and potentially change by the Sterring Committee, then submitted to the School Board. The School Board will review and potentially change the final proposal which will then go to a Bond Election. This is the FIRST step in a long process.

Get involved NOW and STAY involved!!!

Your involvement is critical.
Educational decisions are being made and your voice needs to be heard.
Tuesday September 26th, 2006 was a sub-committee meeting where pro 9th grade and pro high school supporters presented.
The minutes from this meeting and all the sub-committee member meetings are posted on the websites below. All websites are listed to keep you informed.

http://www.paradigmconsultants.com/content.asp?secnum=182
http://tomballisd.blogspot.com/
http://tomballisd.net/ (click on Facility Study lower left corner)

Upcoming Meetings

Tuesday October 3, 2006 7:00 PM TIS Auditorium
Tuesday October 10, 2006 7:30 PM TIS Auditorium
Tuesday October 17, 2006 7:00 PM TIS Auditorium
Tuesday October 24, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn
Wednesday November 1, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn
Wednesday November 8, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Comments from Mayor Harrington

Comments from Mayor Harrington

Monday, September 18, 2006

Meeting Minutes - Sept. 12th

MEETING MINUTES
September 12, 2006
Student Growth/Instructional Facilities Sub-Committee
Facility Study Committee
Tomball Independent School District
Chairman: Brent Lapsley
Co-Chairman: Rocky Fischer
Co-secretaries: SueAnne Wake and Anne Miesen
Facilitators: Dr. Darlene Blair and Huey Kinchen

1. Carrie Pearson will present material next week concerning school size refined to school
districts with size similar to Tomball ISD.
2. Kathy Matt presented current information regarding the new Creekside Park development
in The Woodlands. The projections provided by The Woodlands were identical to those
previously presented by Mr. Scheulke. The communication from the developer did state
that the only homes currently under construction are custom homes, which are very large
and will take about a year to build. Actual enrollment numbers were also presented from
two K-6 elementary schools in the Conroe ISD which cover another part of the
development. Deretchin School opened in the Fall 2005 with fewer than 300 children.
The current enrollment is now at 787. The other school opened in the Fall 2002. The
current enrollment is at 1,115.
3. SueAnne Wake presented information regarding 9th grade only schools. There are many
advantages and disadvantages. Location is a vital consideration in having a 9th grade
only campus. If it is not in close proximity to the high school then the 9th grade students
do not have access to extra-curricular activities. The number of times a student
transitions should also be a consideration. A discussion followed regarding pros and
cons on a 9th grade only campus.
4. Brent Lapsley will talk to Mayor Harrington regarding Tomball ISD’s history of utilizing
a 9th grade only campus. Ronnie Lambert will talk with Klein ISD administrators
regarding the Klein’s history of 9th grade only campus.
5. Questions were raised about the cost of building the different types of schools. Mr.
Lapsley will get this information.
6. The response from Mr. Schuelke regarding existing plans and estimated time to finalize
design, bid and build the various schools was discussed. This document can be found on
the website.
7. Population maps for 2005 and 2010 were presented by David Zuhlke and Rocky Fischer.
These maps can be found on the website. The numbers were close to the numbers
presented by Mr. Schuelke. The percentage of growth in the west and north-west part of
the district is estimated to have the greatest population increase. The south end of the
district and the east side of the district are the areas with the next biggest increase.
8. The committee is in agreement that two elementary schools will need to be built. For the
next meeting, the committee should be ready to discuss locations for these schools,
discuss the option of building a K-6 campus in The Woodlands and the initial boundaries
(zones).
9. Mr. Lapsley will request current enrollment numbers of all schools by grade levels.

Update on New High School

The Sub-Committee seems to be divided into two camps, one is pushing for a 9th grade campus and the other for a new High School.

A 9th grade campus will allow us to continue with only one High School for a few more years, but we are going to eventually need to build another High School. It looks like a 9th grade campus could extend the life of the current HS until about 2013. The problem with that is we would be maxed out at the HS and the 9th grade campus and there would not be any other options.

If we do not build a new HS during this process, we would not be able to have a new HS until the year 2015 at the earliest and probably closer to 2016 or 2017.

A new HS would provide adequate facilities well into the future, probably to the 2020-21 school year.

We are having another meeting Wednesday September 20th, at 7:00pm. If you have an opinion on the future of the Tomball ISD, please try and attend.

Also, if you would like to add any information to this Blog, email me at tyoung66@gmail.com

All the information that has been covered at the meetings can be found here.

Monday, August 21, 2006

Student Growth/Instructional Facilities Sub-Committee
Facility Study Committee
Tomball Independent School District

August 15, 2006

Chairman: Brent Lapsley
Co-Chairman: Rocky Fischer
Co-secretaries: SueAnne Wake and Anne Miesen
Facilitators: Dr. Darlene Blair and Huey Kinchen

The meeting was a joint meeting of all three Facility Study subcommittees in the Tomball High School Auditorium. Meeting minutes were taken by Anne Miesen.

1. All meeting attendees received a copy of 26 page enrollment analysis and growth projections, which was reviewed in detail by David Schuelke, Assistant Superintendent for Ancillary Services.

2. Tomball H.S. maximum capacity has gone from 3,000 to 3,702 since last bond election. Facility is being used in different ways, portables, building additions, etc. However, the revised operational capacity for THS (and the figure this subcommittee should use) is 3,628.

3. A map of the school district, marked with current subdivisions was included in the information packet.

4. A Metro Study was also included with potential future subdivision developments, including The Woodlands. The Woodlands development could include over 4,900 homes. Developments outside The Woodlands, but in TISD, that are in concept stage number 2,188.

5. Assume a factor of .95 school age children per household.

6. Bottom line: Projections vs. capacity analysis five years out (2010-2011) indicate:

Without Woodlands Development
THS 85.01%
TJH 72.8%
Intermediate 93.3%
Elementary 118.5%

With Woodlands
THS 103.78%
TJH 89.92%
Intermediate 116.22%
Elementary 146.13%

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Minutes from first Meeting

Student Growth/Instructional Facilities Sub-Committee
Facility Study Committee
Tomball Independent School District
August 7, 2006

Chairman: Brent Lapsley
Co-Chairman: Rocky Fischer
Co-secretaries: SueAnne Wake and Anne Miesen
Facilitators: Dr. Darlene Blair and Huey Kinchen

The meeting was conducted by Brent Lapsley. Meeting minutes were taken by SueAnne Wake.

1. The schedule for meetings was presented. Most meetings will be held on Tuesday evenings. Two meetings were changed to Wednesday (August 23 and August 30) due to orientation meetings at the elementary schools Meetings are expected to be held either at the Bus Barn or at the high school auditorium. Locations for meetings are tentative and will be confirmed in the individual meeting agendas. A final schedule will be sent to all committee members.

2. The next meeting, scheduled for Tuesday, August 15 at 7:30 PM, will include the three sub-committees. It will take place in the high school auditorium where growth projections will be presented by David Schuelke, Assistant Superintendent for Ancillary Services.

3. The committee decided that email is the preferred way to communicate subcommittee business.

4. Given the large size of the sub-committee, it is possible that smaller groups may be formed to explore specific matters of interest.

5. A question was raised as to the origins of the growth projections. Mr. Lapsley stated that it was his understanding that the school district had contracted with an independent consultant for this information. An additional question related to whether all new housing developments have been incorporated into current projection figures.

6. The primary focus of the sub-committee is the growth of the district. To this end, the sub-committee will examine, among other factors, location of schools, attendance zones, consideration of state-mandated programs and requirements and size of classrooms.

7. A sub-committee member suggested that the Tomball Chamber of Commerce and the Texas Department of Transportation have websites containing growth projections within the district.

8. A request was made for maps of the school district, to include all new housing developments. Mr. Lapsley stated that this information would be provided in future meetings.

9. The minutes and agendas will be provided to all committee members via email. A suggestion was made to establish a website for the committee. Mr. Lapsley and Mr. Kinchen agreed to explore the possibility of placing sub-committee materials on a website. Magda Craige volunteered to assist in creating and/or maintaining the website. This issue will be discussed at further meetings.

10. The committee was reminded that all meetings will be open to the public.

New Facilities Planned Meetings

Meeting Schedule
Student Growth/Instructional Facilities Sub-Committee
Facility Study Committee
Tomball Independent School District


Day Date Time Location

Monday August 7, 2006 7:00 PM THS Auditorium

Tuesday August 15, 2006 7:30 PM THS Auditorium

Wednesday August 23, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Wednesday August 30, 2006 7:00 PM TIS Auditorium

Tuesday September 5, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Tuesday September 12, 2006 7:30 PM Bus Barn

Wednesday September 20, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Tuesday September 26, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Tuesday October 3, 2006 7:00 PM TIS Auditorium

Tuesday October 10, 2006 7:30 PM TIS Auditorium

Tuesday October 17, 2006 7:00 PM TIS Auditorium

Tuesday October 24, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Wednesday November 1, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Wednesday November 8, 2006 7:00 PM Bus Barn

Creation of Sub-Committees

We met last week to create the sub-committees that will be studying the Facilities. There are three sub-committees, one will look at existing facilities, one at finances and the other at the need for new facilities. I signed up for the New Facilities Subcommittee.

I will continue to post information on the sub-committee activities throughout the process. If you have any questions, please let me know. I will post the schedule of meetings, so feel free to attend, they are all open to the public.

Friday, April 07, 2006

Contribute to this Blog to help get the word out...

Please take the time to add comments to the articles I have posted or if you have information you would like added, please send me an e-mail via the link on the right. The more people we can get involved in the process, the more likely we are to come to a solution that is best for everyone in Tomball ISD.

April 4th Tomball ISD Meeting at Lakewood

I attended the April 4th meeting at Lakewood Elementary school to discuss Tomball ISD's upcoming Facility Study Process. This is the first such meeting that I have attended and was surprised at the level of tension in the meeting from the very beginning.

Some of the anger voiced at the meeting involved Tomball ISD's failure to begin this process earlier. Superintendent Neubauer indicated that the goal was to undergo a Facility study every 5 years and it has been 7 years since the last study was done. The Board members indicated that they didn't feel the District was growing fast enough to warrant the study, so they delayed the process until this year. While I do not have any kids in Tomball High School, every indication is that THS is over crowded already and will continue to worsen until the issue is addressed.

I think the end result of this study will be a big group of really smart people getting together and saying..."Hey, I think we need a new High School". The problem with the timing is that any new High School will not open until January 2010 at the earliest. Given a modest 3% increase in attendance over the next few years, that puts the 2009-10 enrollment right at 3000 kids. This will certainly have Tomball High School pushed to its max. That being said, this is the situation we have to deal with, so lets move forward and try and do what is right to make sure that our kids get the best education possible.

Of course, one of the main questions everyone is wondering about is where this new High School will be built, if approved. Once again, I think rumors and misinformation have led everyone to believe that all of this has already been decided, but it hasn't. I have my opinion and I am sure you do as well, but the most logical choice would be to put the new High School in the southern part of the District. I think it would be difficult for anyone without a preset agenda would come to any other conclussion. After the new construction of Northpointe Intermediate School and Willow Wood Junior High in the Southern part of the District, the logical next step is to build the High School in the area as well.

Tomball ISD Facility Study Timeline

Facility Study 2006-2007
Timeline


March 7,2006 Board of Trutees approval of the Facilities Study andTimeline

May 9,2006 Board of Trustees appoints Steering Committee; Charge to Committee and parameters identified

July 24,2006 1st Steering Committee meeting

August 7,2006 Organization and 1 St meeting of Subcommittees

Aug 7-Nov 16 Subcommittees conduct research and develop recommendations to Steering Committee

Nov 16,2006 Subcommittees report recommendations to Steering Committee

December 5,2006 Steering Committee conducts Public Forum

January 9,2007 Steering Committee makes recommendation to Board

Jan 9-Mar 5,2007 Board evaluates recommendations and develops proposal

If indicated:
March 6, 2007 Board calls for Bond Election

April 25,2007 Early voting begins

May 12,2007 Bond Election Day

Tomball ISD Facility Study Process

Here is the text of the document handed out at the April 4th meeting at Lakewood Elementary:

Facility Study Process
2006-2007

The Board of Trustees of the Tomball Independent School District has commissioned a study to be conducted by members of the Tomball Independent School District communityto assess the needs for facilities improvements and expansion for the years 2006-2007through 2010-201 1. A group of prospective participants will be selected by the T.I.S.D.Board of Trustees to form a core of committee members. This core group of members willmeet to organize, divide into subcommittees and solicit other interested people. Additionalparticipants will be solicited via the media and notices sent out to each parent in the district.A meeting will then be held for all interested participants to organize and divide intosubcommittees.


The group will organize themselves into three subcommittees under an overallsteering committee

  • Student Growth and Instructional Facilities Subcommittee
  • Educational Adequacy of Existing/Support Subcommittee
  • Financing Facilities for Student and Program Growth Subcommittee


These subcommittees will study such topics as demographics of the area, populationprojections, programs of other school districts, the district's current financial position andmethods of financing capital expenditures. They may visit campuses, interview teachersand administrators, and do independent research on current quality levels of programs,instruction, and finance in the public education field. Each subcommittee will report ontheir findings and make recommendations to the Steering Committee. The SteeringCommittee will analyze the reports and develop their findings and recommendations.


The findings and recommendations of the Steering Committee will be presented at apublic forum, with the purpose of explaining the process for and conclusions of their studyand soliciting response from the public. The Steering Committee will then present theirfindings and recommendations to the TISD Board of Trustees.


The Board will make a determination, based upon the report of the SteeringCommittee, of the facility needs of the district for the next 5 years and the means to addressthese needs. If a bond election is indicated, the Board will develop the bond proposal andcall the election.

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Welcome

Thanks for taking the time to check out my Blog. I attended a meeting at Lakewood Elementary school on Tuesday, March 4th to discuss Tomball ISD and future sites for new schools in the district.

The most important thing I learned at the meeting was that there is a lot of miss-information out there. As mentioned at the meeting, there are a lot of rumors or "bus-stop" talk about what has already happened or will happen regarding future facilities and mainly a new high school in Tomball.

For this reason, I have decided to start a blog to put out the information I have on this process. I plan to actively participate in this process and will update this blog with any and all information I get along the way. Please check back when possible for updates.